" The full force and authority of a regular police officer is necessary to make such an intrusion. Yet, such a police officer would not be able to summarily search or seize on the premises of a regular home. The homeless person's effects are; therefore, protected from unlawful search and seizure.
Works Cited
http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5020427742
Citron, Eric F. "Right and Responsibility in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence: The Problem with Pretext." Yale Law Journal 116.5 (2007): 1072+.
A www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5000281312
Greenhalgh, William W., and Mark J. Yost. "In Defense of the "Per Se" Rule: Justice Stewart's Struggle to Preserve the Fourth Amendment's...
"The Paradox of Private Policing." Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 95.1 (2004): 49+.
William W. Greenhalgh, and Mark J. Yost, "In Defense of the "Per Se" Rule: Justice Stewart's Struggle to Preserve the Fourth Amendment's Warrant Clause," American Criminal Law Review 31.4 (1994).
Eric F. Citron, "Right and Responsibility in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence: The Problem with Pretext," Yale Law Journal 116.5 (2007).
Elizabeth E. Joh, "The Paradox of Private Policing," Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 95.1 (2004).
